In my work with leaders and teams, I often see people working hard to change a result while continuing to respond in ways that help keep it in place. A leader wants a team to take more initiative but regularly steps in with an answer. A difficult relationship needs attention, but the people involved have become skilled at getting the work done without addressing what is happening between them.
These responses usually make sense when we look at the moment in which they occur. There is a decision to make, a deadline to meet, or a relationship we care about. What can be harder to see is what happens as we repeat them.
I have come to think of this as a kind of practice. We may not intend to develop these habits, but we are strengthening them through use. We are also shaping what other people expect from us and how they respond.
That has led me to a question: What are we getting better at simply because we keep doing it?
Our willingness to help can become part of the pattern
I remember how much I wanted to be someone people could count on during my corporate years. When someone came to me with a problem, I wanted them to leave feeling better equipped to handle it. I listened, asked questions, and often began working out a solution while they were still talking.
I can picture the end of a day, someone stopping by with something they were struggling with. I was tired, with work still unfinished, but I made time. We talked through the situation, and I offered a way forward. They thanked me, and I felt useful. Then I turned back to my own work, aware that I had taken on another piece of theirs.
What was harder to acknowledge was that I liked being needed. There was reassurance in knowing I could help, especially on days when other parts of the job felt uncertain. This was a problem I understood and something I knew how to do.
I could feel overwhelmed by how much depended on me and still take satisfaction in being the person others turned to. I did not always see how those two things were connected.
Looking back, I wonder what might have happened if I had stayed with their thinking a little longer. What had they already considered? Where were they unsure? Did they need my answer, or did they need an opportunity to recognize what they already knew?
I meant to support them. But I may also have been getting better at stepping in, while they were becoming more accustomed to turning to me.
I see this same tension in my work with clients. A leader wants people to take more initiative, yet responds so readily when they ask for direction that the existing pattern continues. The leader carries more responsibility and becomes frustrated that others are not taking it. The team continues to seek the guidance that has always been available.
There are times when a leader needs to provide an answer. But I have learned to pay attention to whether that answer is what the situation requires, or whether providing it has become the most familiar way to contribute.
What we leave unsaid shapes how we work together
The same process can happen around a conversation we are reluctant to enter.
At first, we may have good reasons to wait. We need more information, the timing is poor, or we want to think carefully about what to say. While we wait, however, the work continues, and we make adjustments.
We check something we no longer trust will be completed. We give an assignment to someone else. We change what we expect without making that change explicit. Each adjustment may help us get through the immediate situation. Over time, those adjustments can become the way the work gets done.
The person whose work is being checked may not know that trust has changed. The person receiving additional responsibility may not understand why it has become theirs. People are responding to an issue that has never been clearly discussed, and they may hold very different understandings of what is happening.
We become skilled at managing the consequences of what we have not said.
I take seriously the care that can sit behind this reluctance. People do not necessarily avoid a conversation because they are indifferent. They may be concerned about hurting someone or damaging a relationship that matters to them. They may also be unsure how to acknowledge their own contribution to the difficulty.
Yet as the workarounds become more familiar, the conversation can become harder. There is more history to understand and more that has gone unexplained. What began as a temporary adjustment has become an arrangement that other people now rely on.
It is worth asking whether the time we are taking is helping us prepare for the conversation, or whether we are learning to live without having it.
What we think we know can limit what we hear
Our assumptions about one another are also strengthened through repetition.
We hear a colleague question a decision and understand it as resistance. We notice that someone is quiet and assume they agree. Our interpretation may draw on years of experience with that person, which can make it feel unnecessary to ask what they mean.
Sometimes, our understanding is accurate. But when we stop checking, we also lose opportunities to discover what has changed or what we have misunderstood.
This matters because our interpretation shapes our response. If we hear a question as resistance, we may defend the decision before understanding the concern. If that happens often enough, the other person may become less willing to ask. We then hear fewer questions and may conclude that there is greater agreement.
What we see appears to confirm what we believed, even though our own response has helped produce it.
I have come to appreciate how much can open up when we are willing to ask someone to say more, particularly when we feel certain we already understand. It allows them to explain what they see and gives us an opportunity to recognize something our familiarity may have caused us to miss.
Changing a pattern asks something of us too
These everyday responses matter because other people learn how to work with us. They learn whether we will leave enough time for them to think, what happens when they bring us a problem, and whether there is room to question our understanding.
Over time, our responses and theirs become connected. This is part of how a team develops its ways of working, often without anyone deliberately choosing them.
Recognizing our part gives us a place to begin. It also asks us to be patient. People who have learned to rely on our answers may need time to trust that we want them to develop their own. A concern that has long gone unspoken may take more than one conversation to understand.
I think again about those end-of-day conversations in my corporate life. I could have cared just as much about the person and their problem while leaving more room for them to work through it. But that would have asked something of me. I would have needed to remain in the uncertainty a little longer and become more comfortable with making a contribution whose value was not immediately obvious.
That is part of the work for leaders. We are asking others to develop new ways of working while becoming willing to examine the familiar responses that may make those changes difficult.
The next time someone brings us a problem, or a conversation becomes quiet, there is an opportunity to notice what we are preparing to do. We may still choose to offer an answer. We may recognize that a question or a little more time would be useful. What matters is that we can see a choice where we might previously have responded without thinking.
What if you’re getting better at the very thing you’re trying to change?
Explore my website to learn more about the work I do with leaders, businesses, and organizations. I’d love to connect and start a conversation about how we might work together.
Comments +